Self-collected versus provider-collected vaginal swabs for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis: an assessment of validity and reliability

DB Nelson, S Bellamy, TS Gray, I Nachamkin - Journal of clinical …, 2003 - Elsevier
DB Nelson, S Bellamy, TS Gray, I Nachamkin
Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2003Elsevier
Bacterial vaginosis (BV) in pregnancy is related to numerous adverse events; however, the
validity of different methods of vaginal swab collection to diagnosis BV among pregnant
women is unclear. This study examines the validity of self-collected compared with provider-
collected vaginal swabs and describes the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of BV
assessment among a sample of pregnant women early in gestation. Gram-stain evaluation
of vaginal samples using the Nugent criteria was conducted to determine the overall and …
Bacterial vaginosis (BV) in pregnancy is related to numerous adverse events; however, the validity of different methods of vaginal swab collection to diagnosis BV among pregnant women is unclear. This study examines the validity of self-collected compared with provider-collected vaginal swabs and describes the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of BV assessment among a sample of pregnant women early in gestation. Gram-stain evaluation of vaginal samples using the Nugent criteria was conducted to determine the overall and morphotype-specific BV scores. We found strong validity for the overall and morphotype-specific scores comparing self-collected swabs to provider-collected swabs. In addition, we found excellent overall and morphotype-specific inter-rater reliability and excellent intra-rater reliability in our sample. These study results support the use of self-collected vaginal swabs for diagnosing BV and document the reliability of BV assessment among pregnant women.
Elsevier