[HTML][HTML] TATTON: a multi-arm, phase Ib trial of osimertinib combined with selumetinib, savolitinib, or durvalumab in EGFR-mutant lung cancer

GR Oxnard, JCH Yang, H Yu, SW Kim, H Saka… - Annals of …, 2020 - Elsevier
GR Oxnard, JCH Yang, H Yu, SW Kim, H Saka, L Horn, K Goto, Y Ohe, H Mann, KS Thress
Annals of Oncology, 2020Elsevier
Background Osimertinib is a potent, third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor
(EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). The multi-arm phase Ib TATTON study
(NCT02143466) was designed to assess the safety and tolerability of osimertinib in
combination with other targeted therapies: selumetinib (MEK1/2 inhibitor), savolitinib (MET-
TKI), or durvalumab [anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1) monoclonal
antibody]. Patients and methods Patients with advanced EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung …
Background
Osimertinib is a potent, third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). The multi-arm phase Ib TATTON study (NCT02143466) was designed to assess the safety and tolerability of osimertinib in combination with other targeted therapies: selumetinib (MEK1/2 inhibitor), savolitinib (MET-TKI), or durvalumab [anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1) monoclonal antibody].
Patients and methods
Patients with advanced EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer and disease progression on a prior EGFR-TKI were enrolled and allocated to dose-escalating cohorts combining osimertinib 80 mg orally (p.o.) once a day with selumetinib (25–75 mg p.o. twice a day; continuous or intermittent), savolitinib (600–800 mg p.o. once a day), or durvalumab (3–10 mg/kg intravenous every 2 weeks).
Results
At data cut-off (28 February 2018), 77 patients were enrolled and received osimertinib plus selumetinib (n = 36), savolitinib (n = 18), or durvalumab (n = 23). Most common adverse events (any grade), occurring in ≥20% of patients across dose groups, were: selumetinib arm—diarrhea (75%), rash (58%), nausea (47%); savolitinib arm—nausea (67%), rash (56%), vomiting (50%); durvalumab arm—rash (48%), vomiting (43%), diarrhea (39%). Dose-limiting toxicities were reported in the selumetinib 25 mg (n = 1), 50 mg (n = 1), and 75 mg (n = 4) continuous-dose groups, savolitinib 600 mg (n = 1) and 800 mg dose groups (n = 2), and durvalumab 10 mg/kg (n = 1) dose group. The objective response rate was 42% (95% confidence interval 26% to 59%), 44% (22% to 69%), and 43% (23% to 66%) in the selumetinib, savolitinib, and durvalumab arms, respectively.
Conclusion
Our results demonstrate the feasibility of combining osimertinib 80 mg with selumetinib or savolitinib at identified tolerable, active doses. A combination of osimertinib with durvalumab was not feasible due to increased reporting of interstitial lung disease. Osimertinib-based combination therapies represent a compelling approach now being further investigated.
Clinical trials number
NCT02143466.
Elsevier